A. Here’s more proof that there has been a huge increase in applicants with good LSAT scores this year. Law.com
B. The Ninth Circuit ruled today that employers can’t use an employee’s past salary to justify paying men more than women for the same job. The Hill
C. Today in They Don’t Teach You This in Your Professional Ethics Class (file under: Well Why Did You Have to Make That Class So Expensive, Anyway?): A law school grad working as a cashier at Kohl’s was suspended from the Florida bar for stealing $760 from the registers. Miami Herald
D. Apparently the Supreme Court is handing down decisions at a sluggish pace this term. Old people, amirite? Reuters
E. But here’s an alternative explanation for that sluggish pace: the high court’s opinions are getting longer. Empirical SCOTUS
Related Posts
Search the Blog
Free LSAT Practice Account
Sign up for a free Blueprint LSAT account and get access to a free trial of the Self-Paced Course and a free practice LSAT with a detailed score report, mind-blowing analytics, and explanatory videos.
Learn More
Popular Posts
-
-
logic games Game Over: LSAC Says Farewell to Logic Games -
-
General LSAT Advice How to Get a 180 on the LSAT -
Entertainment Revisiting Elle's LSAT Journey from Legally Blonde